The release of “Animal,” directed by Sandeep Reddy Vanga and starring Ranbir Kapoor, has ignited a storm of controversy, not just for its content but also for the response it received from the makers after veteran lyricist Javed Akhtar expressed his concerns. While the film’s success was celebrated with grandeur, Javed Akhtar’s critique on certain problematic scenes sparked a war of words. This article delves into the unfolding controversy, exploring the lyricist’s criticism, the makers’ sharp retort, and the subsequent backlash from the audience.
Join WhatsApp Channel
Join Telegram ChannelJaved Akhtar’s Concerns:
At the 9th Ajanta-Ellora International Film Festival, Javed Akhtar, a respected figure in the film industry, voiced his apprehensions about “Animal.” He specifically highlighted scenes portraying a man instructing a woman to lick his shoe and endorsing violence against women. The lyricist deemed the success of such films as “dangerous” and expressed worry about the impact on society.
- Advertisement -
Makers’ Response: “Your Art Form is Big False”:
In an unexpected move, the official Twitter handle of “Animal” responded to Javed Akhtar’s criticism with a terse statement: “your art form is big false.” The brash and dismissive reply took many by surprise, as it seemed to undermine the concerns raised by Akhtar and sparked a heated debate on social media.
Twitter Backlash: Makers Under Fire:
The makers’ response to Javed Akhtar’s critique did not sit well with the Twitterverse. Netizens were quick to call out the insensitive and disrespectful nature of the reply. Many argued that a more thoughtful and constructive engagement with criticism, especially from a seasoned artist like Javed Akhtar, would have been more appropriate.
- Advertisement -
The Problematic Nature of “Animal”:
While “Animal” garnered attention for its star-studded cast and intense narrative, it also faced criticism for certain scenes that raised ethical and moral concerns. The controversy surrounding the film goes beyond Javed Akhtar’s comments, with discussions on the responsibility of filmmakers to depict scenes that align with societal values and do not glorify violence or misogyny.
Public Expectations from Filmmakers:
- Advertisement -
The incident involving Javed Akhtar and the makers of “Animal” highlights the evolving expectations of the audience regarding the responsibility of filmmakers. In an era where content is under constant scrutiny for its impact on society, filmmakers are increasingly urged to strike a balance between creative expression and ethical storytelling.
The Intersection of Art and Responsibility:
The clash between Javed Akhtar and the makers of “Animal” brings to the forefront the complex relationship between artistic freedom and societal responsibility. While filmmakers have the right to explore diverse narratives, there is a growing demand for content that is mindful of its influence on the audience and adheres to ethical standards.
Navigating the Artistic Landscape:
As the controversy surrounding “Animal” continues to unfold, it serves as a reflection of the broader conversation within the film industry. The clash between Javed Akhtar and the makers underscores the need for open dialogue, constructive criticism, and a nuanced understanding of the impact that cinematic content can have on societal norms. Moving forward, it remains to be seen whether this incident sparks a deeper conversation about the intersection of artistic expression and social responsibility in the world of filmmaking.
